Academic Medical Center

Scaling a Care Management Program From Pilot to System-Wide Deployment

A leading academic medical center struggled to scale a high-performing pilot beyond two departments. We deployed the model across 11 service lines within 14 months.

Impact

  • Deployed across 11 service lines in 14 months — ahead of the 18-month target
  • 22% reduction in 30-day readmission rates across scaled service lines
  • Care management staffing model standardized, reducing per-unit labor cost by 18%
  • Program embedded in operational governance, no longer dependent on founding champion
Scaling a Care Management Program From Pilot to System-Wide Deployment

Context

The care management program had originated in the cardiac surgery service line three years earlier, driven by a committed clinical champion with both the evidence base and the organizational relationships to make it work in a constrained environment. The pilot produced compelling results: 30-day readmission rates fell by 24%, patient satisfaction scores improved, and length of stay for the targeted patient cohort declined by 1.2 days on average.

The results attracted significant internal attention. The CMO commissioned an expansion plan. The board approved funding. And for 18 months, the organization attempted to scale the model to additional service lines — with minimal success. Two departments had adopted modified versions of the program; nine had not.

Challenge

Our diagnostic work identified the characteristic pattern of a stalled scaling program. The founding clinical champion had been assigned responsibility for the expansion without dedicated time, staff, or decision-making authority over the service lines she was trying to influence. Each new service line required its own negotiation, its own adaptation of the program model, and its own clinical buy-in process — all conducted informally, in parallel with her primary clinical duties.

The program also lacked what we call a transition architecture. The pilot had been designed to demonstrate results; it had not been designed to be transferred. Staffing models, workflow integrations, training programs, and performance metrics all existed in the institutional knowledge of the founding team rather than in documented, transferable systems.

Finally, there was no executive continuity mechanism. The CMO who had sponsored the program had departed. His successor was supportive but not engaged — and the program had no formal accountability structure that would have prompted his engagement.

Approach

We structured the scaling engagement around three parallel workstreams that addressed each of the diagnosed failure modes simultaneously.

Program Codification

We worked with the founding team to document the care management model in sufficient detail that it could be transferred to new clinical teams without the founding champion's direct involvement. This included staffing specifications, workflow integration requirements, training curricula, data infrastructure requirements, and the performance measurement framework. The codification process took eight weeks and produced materials that became the foundation for every subsequent service line deployment.

Scaling Governance

We designed a scaling governance structure that gave the program formal standing in the organization's operational decision-making. This included a steering committee with CMO co-sponsorship and service line medical director participation, a dedicated program management office with full-time staff, and a 14-month deployment plan with explicit milestones and accountability assignments.

Service Line Deployment

We led the deployment across 11 service lines using a sequenced rollout approach — beginning with service lines whose leadership had expressed interest and whose operational context was most similar to the original pilot, then moving to more complex or resistant contexts as the program model was refined through early deployments. Each deployment was managed as a discrete project with its own clinical champion, transition plan, and go-live criteria.

Impact

The program reached full deployment across 11 service lines in 14 months — four months ahead of the original 18-month target. Scaled service lines showed a 22% reduction in 30-day readmission rates relative to pre-program baselines, approaching the 24% achieved in the original pilot.

Standardization of the care management staffing model across service lines reduced per-unit labor cost by 18% compared to the ad hoc models that had been operating in the two early-adopter departments.

Most importantly, the program is no longer dependent on any individual champion. It is embedded in the medical center's operational governance, measured through the standard performance management framework, and owned by operational leadership rather than by a clinical department. The founding champion has returned full-time to her clinical role, which was the explicit design goal from the start of the engagement.

Continue the conversation

Explore how we can help

Our consulting team works with healthcare leaders to deliver measurable outcomes.

Speak with our team